Workshop on Quality and Authenticity of web resources.

Workshop on Quality and Authenticity of web resources.

Hello...
Readers!

     

Here is my blog on quality and Authenticity on sources.
  Workshop is organized by Dilip Bard Sir of the English Department.
  Source Academic Assessment Rubric (illustration) represents the development of a critical approach that has adopted and utilized websites in analyzing student resources for Turnitin.


Introduction :

We live in 21st century of the world of technology and Internet exploration, where all the research is done under the digital platform. Therefore, the question in our minds is .What is the trust and reliance on these web resources, whether or not they are reliable and what is the quality of their products and information.

  Trinity-prevention stolen students have created a rubric for students to evaluate resources that are mostly checked by students and whether we can use them for educational purposes and research.

  Source Academic Assessment Rubric (illustration) represents the evolution of the critical approach that Trinity has adopted and utilized in the analysis of student resources.


Rubric was created by academic experts for students. The rubric is made on five criteria.


(1) Authoritative
 (2)  Educational value
(3)  Intent
 (4) Originality
 (5) Quality
       

Three websites:
   (1) https://www.wikipedia.com
    (2) https://www.britannica.com
    (3) https://www.sparknotes.com


(1) https://www.wikipedia.com

   Authoritative : 3 mark

In authentic I give Wikipedia 3 points. A Wikipedia site is a very or well-regarded site that references, cites, and provides good content.

 

   Educational value: 3 mark
 
The Wikipedia site for educational value is the source of respectable content.


   Intent : 4 mark
 
Wikipedia is considered a high source that provides a highly respected source of content. The purpose is that Wikipedia is meant to provide many resources and inform users.

   Originality : 2 mark
 
The Wikipedia site offers users some original content

   Quality : 2 mark
    Wikipedia quality standards. The specific problem is that the summary section is longer, this is longer than our actual article.

   (2) https://www.britannica.com

   Authoritative : 4 mark
 
Britannica has worked with the world's leading partner organizations and experts. The site does a great job of providing us with high quality information and links, the information is well-regarded, well-cited, written by a skilled author.


   Educational value: 3 mark

   Britannica is good for educational purposes. Its contents instructional goal. The goal of Britannica's extensive knowledge, all with the goal of helping the world's psyche and finding information with confidence.

   Intent : 4 mark

Britannica Knowledge Expert Network. To support the needs of our growing audience around Britannica and this term.

   Originality: 3 mark

   Those contents are original but are collected sources that provide the original source for some time.

   Quality : 3 mark
  Good content is provided with quality and short content of Britannica sources.

(3) https://www.sparknotes .com

    Authoritative : 3 mark

    Educational value : 3 mark

    Intent : 2 mark

   Originality : 3 mark

   Quality: 4 mark

All three websites have different types of rubric evaluations. It offers reliable resources.