Monday, 24 February 2020

Two Fantastic Duo of The Romantic Age: Wordsworth meets Samuel Taylor Coleridge.


Two Fantastic Duo of The Romantic Age: Wordsworth meets Samuel Taylor Coleridge.



W.Wordsworth:- Hello Samuel, How are you?



S.Coleridge:-  Hello William, I'm fine, thank you. Nice to meet you!



W.Wordsworth:- After a long time, we've met.



W.Wordsworth:- Since we both are connected with English literature, what kind of literature you've produced?



S.Coleridge:- In the midst of the French Revolution, Wordsworth visited France in 1790 and was a supporter of the new government's republican ideals. For this, I am sending greetings. Wordsworth was influenced by fanatics such as William Godwin.



W.Wordsworth:- Coleridge You published the first part of my poem, Poems on Various Subjects, and the first of ten volumes of a liberal political publication called The Watchman.



S.Coleridge:- Wordsworth began writing The Prelude, an epic autobiography he revised throughout his life while working on The Prelude, writing Wordsworth's other poems like "Lucy."



W.Wordsworth:- When you moved back to England in 1800, he settled with family and friends at Keswick. Over the next two decades, Coleridge lectured on literature and philosophy, writing about religious and political theory,



S.Coleridge:- He also wrote an introduction to another edition of the song ballads; It describes his poetry as inspired by powerful emotions and is seen as a declaration of Romantic principles.



W.Wordsworth:- He published the Biographia Literaria, which contained his best literary criticism. He continued to publish poetry and prose.



Wordsworth meets Samuel Taylor Coleridge. The two became friends, and worked together on the Lyrical Ballads (1798). The room contains poems such as Coleridge's "Rhyme the Fist Mariner" and Wordsworth's "Tintern Abbey" and helped Romanticism capture English poetry.

Monday, 10 February 2020

Thinking Activity : Movie Screening : Frankenstein


Thinking Activity : Movie Screening : Frankenstein :


Hello Readers !

Warmly welcome to my blog...

Here is my blog on the novel. The Frankenstein movie is based on the Frankenstein novel by Mary Shelley. Frankenstein is a novel written by Mary Shelley that tells the story of Victor Frankenstein, a scientist who created the traditional scientific experiment of a secret mysterious creature. Our class teacher Heenaba zala given this task after viewing and pre viewing and while viewing point of view you can Click here and see..


Mary Shelley :




Mary Shelley was born on 1797, in London. She was the second child of the feminist philosopher, educator and writer Mary Wollstonecraft and the first child of the philosopher, novelist and journalist William Godwin. She married poet Percy Bysshe Shelley in 1816. Two years later, she published her most famous novel, Frankenstein.



Pre-Viewing tasks :




1. what is Gothic Scientific fiction?


Mary Shelley's Frankenstein was a gothic scientific fiction. We see that all the features of the Gothic Scientific novel in Mary Shelley's novel Frankenstein.

Gothic Science also known as Space Goth, is a subgenre literature that includes Gothic conventions. By definition we can connect this novel as Gothic science fiction. It also reflects the dark atmosphere of Gothic literature while also incorporating elements of science fiction. science fiction is a macabre sub-genre that transcends scientific literature and Gothic literature. Gothic Scientific Fiction has the same atmospheric qualities as Gothic literature, but doesn't thrive in the ths oranges of horror. The sub-genre takes specific elements of Gothic literature and explains them scientifically. Some examples of common features of Gothic literature: Mystery: Supernatural, haunted houses, castles, darkness, death and decay, romance madness, monsters.



2. What is Frame narrative?


This novel narrated by Walter who is reading his sister Seville. Walter told the story by telling his crew members in the ship. Coulter describes the whole story. Frame Story is set a story within a movie told by a lead or supporting character. A character begins telling a story to other characters, or he or she sits down to write a story, telling the audience the details. This technique is also called "frame story", and it is very popular with literary techniques employed in storytelling and narration.



3. What is the point of view of the author?


Frankenstein is described in the first person by different individuals at different points in the novel. After this, the outlook gives Victor, who continues his story. The novel ends with a return to Walton's point of view and a first-person statement. The key to discovering why Mary Shelley Frankenstein wrote it, with the notion of exploring both distracting and entertaining stories. The novel informs her remarkable idea of ​​a man-made creature, appealing to readers in two ways at the same time. In a novel, a deep emotional appeal to the deepest desires for understanding of immortality and human origin in man. On the other hand, most of the intrigues of his novel are the creator's reaction to his creation and are poorly connected to the idea of ​​man-made life.



4. Do you have confusion about the title of the novel?


Mary Shelley gave the very appropriate title of her novel "Frankenstein". Any literary work based primarily on the main character and central theme or central idea of ​​the work in a given literary title. Here we see that the story of the victor Frankenstein and the protagonist Frankenstein is described in the novel. I have no confusion about the title of the novel. The title references the scientist, but the heart of the book is the monster, so confusion was inevitable. Trending story, stories inside stories.



5. Who do you think the real monster, the creator or the creature?


In the novel we find two characters that both fit for the real monster. One Frankenstein and the other Monster. From my point of view creator Walter Frankenstein is also a monster. society does not accept it because of its ugly appearance. When he realized that the winner was responsible for his creation, he decided to take revenge.

To my views I think both the creator or the society are real demons. First we want to see how the Creator means the winner is the real monster. This monster is the most literal of a number of monster figures in the novel. Used to create a monster, including the winner. Victor himself is a kind of monster, as he removes him from human society with ambition, secrecy and selfishness. Normal on the outside, it may be the true "monster" inside, as it is eventually consumed by the false hatred of its creation. It was not able to adapt its composition due to the sheer appearance of its composition. She had to look after him as the creator of the animal but she was not. He neglects to create a winner when his spouse wants it because he thinks about the negative aspects that both of these demons are dangerous to society.



6. What is the significance of the subtitle "The Modern Prometheus"?


The subtitle of the novel "The Modern Prometheus" is one of the many suggestions about radical changes in the modern world.



7. What is tabula rasa?


The tabula rasa suggests that Frankenstein's failure to act as a parental person toward the creator influences his personality and mind-set in relation to society and the surroundings, transforming his mind from the blake slate.




While viewing the movie :





1. How is the beginning and the end of the movie?


Hurricanes like North Pole tell the story of the victorious Frankenstein and his monster creation, in the atmosphere and the beginning of the movie Wandering.



2. Do you feel the effect of horror in the movie?


Yes, of course  I feel the effect of horror in the many of scenes  in the movie. When Victor performs a scientific experiment on a dead human body, these scenes are also terrifying. We feel awful when Elizabeth burns herself to the fire.



3. What do you think about character of the Monster in the movie?


In the movie the monster of my view that really plays a dangerous role in society and the life of the Victor monster. The monsters look too low so it was rejected by its creator winner. When a monster enters society, people are very scared of its ugly appearance. Even the society does not accept the demons. They treat them very rude. Do you think that was the case when the monster was rejected by the creation or society? Naturally, he was very angry with his creator because he was made of very ugly looks. Monster was alone, he needed someone's company, so he asks Victor to make a female monster, but the winner didn't do it. Because the winner feared it was harmful to society. He died with his creator at the end of the film. I really feel empathy.



4. What do you think about the conversation between Victor and the monster?


The monster speaks loud enough to convince Victor to calm down and to hear his case. He asks if Victor will hear his "long and strange" story. And Victor, this time, is the opposite of that he can only think of hatred for a monster. Thus, Shelley makes the monster a sympathetic creature.




Post-viewing tasks:




1. What is the difference between the movie and the novel?


The difference between a Mary Shelley novel and a Kenneth Branagh movie is that Henry was killed by a monster in the novel, but in the movie it's different. And there are many differences.



Q.2 Does the movie help you to understand narrative structure of the novel?


Yes, This movie helps a lot in understanding the novel. The process of demonizing the winner by Kenneth Branagh is very well represented in his film.



3. Do you think the movie is helpful to understand the viewpoints of different characters?


The movie helps to understand the different perspectives of the characters like Frankenstein's aim towards the making of the monster, and the monster's point of view, too. If we just read the novels after reading them, we may not find anything terrifying, but after watching the movies, we find such horrific scenes in the movie.



4. What do you think about the creation of lady monster in the novel and Elizabeth's look of a monster in the novel? 


In the movie we see that the victor demonizes the man. The Monster looks very low, so he rejects it. We can see that when the monster asked the winner for the creation of Lady Monster he did not do it. But when the monster kills Elizabeth, the victor becomes a woman demon. Because Victor loves Elizabeth he does not want to lose Elizabeth which is why he made the woman a monster and he accepted her. Lady Monster is designed to revive her beloved Elizabeth, and she also suffers and commits suicide.

Thinking Activity : Derrida & Deconstruction


Thinking Activity : Derrida & Deconstruction  :


Hello Readers!

Welcome to my blog. Here I am talking about Derrida and Deconstruction thinking activity. This task given by Dr.Dilip barad sir, For more information on Deconstruction. Click here


Jacques Derrida :





Jacques Derrida was an Algerian-born French philosopher known for developing a form of semiotic analysis called deconstruction, which he discussed in numerous texts, and developed in the context of phenomena. He is one of the leading figures associated with post-structuralism and postmodern philosophy.



Deconstruction :




Deconstruction is a theory and practice of reading, to read the questions and claims that 'subvert' or 'undermine' the notion that the language system provides, and that establishes boundaries, coherence or unity, and provides the literary meaning. Deconstruction is an approach to understanding the relationship between text and meaning. It was originated by the philosopher Jack Derrida, whose approach was to conduct lessons in the pursuit of things that run contrary to its intended meaning or structural unity. The purpose of deconstruction is to show that the use of the language, and the entire language, in a given text is unobtrusively complex, unstable, or impossible.


Criticism of the deconstruction of literature is the study of theory and reading that questions and 'threatens' or 'validates' the claim that the language system provides the ground that boundaries are sufficient to establish coherence or unity. And determine the meaning of the literary text. In the new critique, the author's attention turns to the work of literary writing; The process continues with textual analysis, becoming more important than additional textual information. So the author disappears and only the text is left. In this process the reader's understanding and understanding of the importance of it is ever increasing.


Deconstruction is not a destructive activity, but it is a basic test of everything. Deconstruction is not a negative word at all. It does not mean destructive activity or breaking up at any time. Derrida says deconstruction is not a destructive activity, but an investigation into the underlying causes of the intellectual system. One of the issues is that Derrida wants to change people's ideology and, therefore, the whole structure of Western ideas has to change, that is what Derrida wants to emphasize, it takes a high degree project of deconstruction. Which he wants to translate from German to French and the famous later Japanese friend was Professor Izutsu, who wanted to translate Derrida's French text into Japanese, so he wanted to know how to translate deconstruction, how to deconstruct. It is not a deconstruction in itself, but an inquiry into the limits of the philosophical system is the relevant condition that produced the philosophy system, the conditions under which it was constrained. Derrida argues that who created the intellectual system, based on the distinction of binary opposition, is the same position responsible for opposing both.


Advertisement : Saare Mel Dho Daalo ghadi




The above advertisement is about detergent powder. This certainly has a powerful message to the audience. The advertisement depicts the situation of a typical Indian household where the Diwali preparations are pending and the mother looks helpless as she is not ready to support anyone in the preparations. A young person is also shown as a person who does not respect the housekeeper.

When a mother prepares her son for her house cleaning to celebrate Diwali, she realizes the hard workers she has worked to earn money. The main objective behind this campaign is to explain the value of each business to the people. Discrimination or disrespect to anyone based on their profession is not what our culture teaches us. Saare Mel Dho Daalo ghadi with the title wants us to remove all the stains that are inside us.

The idea behind the campaign perfectly suits Ghadi's brand reputation and is a great way to restore the glory of the work to viewers. Here is a complete video that will show you respect for a housemaid.

Thinking Activity : Culture and Anarchy


Thinking Activity : Culture and Anarchy  


Hello Readers!

  Here I am talking about culture and Anarchy and some key points and what I understanding about it. so my blog on culture and Anarchy. This task is given by Dr. Dilip Barad Sir,


Culture and Anarchy is a magazine essay by Matthew Arnold. "Culture is defined as the study of perfection with Anarchy. Culture and Anarchy is the great work of Matthew Arnold, published in 1869. Culture and anarchical essays were first published in the Cornhill Magazine in 1867-68. It contradicts Arnold's culture, which he defines as "the practice of perfection," in the prevailing mood of a new democracy in England at the time. The complete essay engages with culture as a great aid in our quest for perfection to know all the present problems and all things of the culture which concern us with the best.


His essays are divided into the following chapters:

1. What is culture?
2. Sweetness and light?
3. Doing as one likes - Anarchy
4. Barbarians,Philistines, Populace
5. Hebraism and Hellenism
6. Porro Unum est Necessarium
7. Our Liberal Practitioners

Let's talk about it in detail.......


Critique : 1


1. What is culture?

Key points :

1. The study of perfection
2. Innocent perfection, normal perfection.
3. Imagine a culture
4. A character of beauty and ingenuity


What I understand from it :

Culture is the study of perfection and harmonious perfection, the practice of ordinary perfection which is involved in becoming something. It's not static, it's changeable. It is a study of social and moral perfection. It is a study of innocent perfection. Innocent expansion of human capacity.


Critique : 2


1. Sweetness and light?

Key points :

1. Active intelligence
2. Critic of the historian and sociologist
3. Love for perfection
4. Sense of beauty


What I understand from it :

Sweetness and light are the main characters. A Critical Argument About Society. Sweetness is moral light is power and truth. Culture connects with the idea of ​​sweetness and light. Sweetness means the sense of beauty and light means active intelligence. Sweetness gives moral values. Sweetness and light try to show that culture is the study of the pursuit of perfection.



Critique : 3


1. Doing as one likes - Anarchy

Key points :


1. Personal liberty statements
2. Middle and working class
3. Freedom

 
  What I understand from it :


Matthew Arnold said that the freedom to do whatever we want in our society, to one another. Matthew Arnold said there is a balance between control and spontaneity. According to Matthew Arnold, the freedom you like is the one without the desire for freedom for the end.



Critique : 4



1. Barbarians,Philistines, Populace

Key points :


1. Personal freedom
2. Three classes
3. Middle class - helpless disorder
4. Class and defects.
5. Society of England Class systems

What I understand from it :

In this chapter Arnold divide into three classes Barbarianism, Philistines, and Populace are classes of England. he analyzes them with his qualities and drawbacks. It designates these three classes as an elite, middle and working class. Arnold says all three classes are happy with what they like. All three classes of individuals, who have the common human spirit to attain perfection. According to Matthew Arnold Aristrocraft, barbarism is called the middle class Philistines and the working class known as Populace.



Critique : 5


1. Hebraism and Hellenism


Key points :


1. The perfection of man
2. Hebraism - The Movement of Christianity
3. Hardness of consciousness and spontaneity of consciousness
4. Complimentary
5. Hellenism - movement of Renaissance



What I understand from it :


According to Matthew Arnold, Hebraism and Hellenism are the perfection of man.
they prefer to act rather than think. He rejected it because mankind is does not always think right, but it rarely comes into the process of logic and meditation. Hebraism and Hellenism are both praiseworthy. Hellenism is spontaneous and Hebraism is obedient and perfect balance is the purpose of culture.



Critique : 6


1. Porro Unum est Necessarium

Key points :

1. The tragedy of the era
2. The existence of democracy
3. Absence of some authority
4. Synchronous development


What I understand from it :


Arnold is important to us because Arnold's frequent insistence on revision is with Arnold. The need for a mass system of action beyond the notion of the existence of a Democrat in Neisserium. Arnold said that the harmonious development of our humanity, independent thinking on our routing nation and envisioning the liberal idea of ​​democratic existence as a free will the concept of freedom democracy. 

Tuesday, 4 February 2020

Cultural Studies : Workshop by Dr. Kalyani Vallath


Cultural Studies : Workshop by Dr. Kalyani Vallath :



Hello My Dear Readers...


27 December 2019




Here is my blog about Cultural Studies. We have participated in a workshop on cultural studies of the department of English Maharaja Krishnakumar Sinhji Bhavnagar University. One day workshop organized by Dr Dilip Bard, Head of the English Department. Dr. Kalyani Vallath is a very passionate teacher of Trivandrum in Kerala. She taught us about cultural studies and different theories. Her way of teaching is really appreciated. She has the coolest voice and personality. Her teaching style is very different from others. She gave many examples of culture study. Cultural studies is a very difficult subject but she taught us very easily and interestingly. That's why we enjoyed the session whole day without any hesitation. We got many more important guidance about culture study.



What is your understanding about the concept of Cultural Studies?



In my view, cultural studies is the study of our culture. Our culture is very different from other cultures. How cultural learning relates to literature is very important in cultural studies. Cultural studies provide us with invaluable skills in writing, thinking, and expression. Cultural studies are about interdisciplinary studies. Cultural studies belong to a larger community or society. India is the best place to talk about culture, because India has a big community. Cultural Studies is an innovative interdisciplinary field of research and education that explores the ways in which "culture" creates and transforms personal experiences, everyday life, social relationships and power. People belong to different cultures. Cultural studies is a study about politics, history, media, philosophy, economics, social realities and so on. When we learn about culture, we discover how culture transforms personal experiences, social realities and power relationships. The Kalyani Ma'm explained in her own personal experience. Cultural studies evolved in response to liberal humanism and hedonistic Marxism. Culture has both a physical and a spiritual substance. Cultural studies is not just about the author who writes but also about how people consume text and how it is embedded in our lives. Due to this, our education is the main target for the examination such as gender, sexuality, gender, class and other societies.



How would you explain a layman about Cultural Studies?



 Let me explain to a layman about cultural studies. So I will give a very simple example that Dr. Kalyan Madam gave in the session. Most people in Kerala are vegetarian. So people slaughter goats and other animals and they drink and drink blood because of poverty. But not all Kerala people eat the blood of animals. According to Matthew Arnold, cultural studies are about perfection. She talks about high culture. Cultural studies are the opposite of Arnold and F.R. Lewis. Cultural studies are a concern of ordinary people. 



If you are asked in interview to teach Cultural Studies - How would you introduce it?



 If I said in the interview that I would present it a lot easier than to teach cultural studies. I asked some basic questions about cultural studies. And I present it with very simple examples. How cultural studies are associated with literature and everyday life. and also that is based on political economy, communication, sociology, social theory, literary theory, media theory, film studies, cultural anthropology, philosophy, art, history, Criticism, etc.



How many examples from the sessions were so catchy that you will never forget it? Write about it.



Throughout the session Madame gives many examples. Dr. Kalyani Mamm gives an example that relates to her personal family or experience and also examples of society. An example of a session I will never forget is about advertising for culinary powder. The ads includes women who cook for her husband and ask her husband for a dish test and her husband tells a very tasty dish how you all manage. Give an example with a Madam expression in the session. And that's why we enjoyed the whole session, and Madam also gives another example of why men don't cook for women and only women cook.



Anything else....




The whole session has been very interesting and useful for us. We clearly understand cultural studies. Many examples have been given by Kalyani Mam during the session. Cultural studies transforms personal experiences. She gave her own example. When she travels abroad. Cultural studies are also about the relationship mankind. Cultural studies is an interdisciplinary study. In the workshop we have learned a lot of things. Thanks to Kalyani Mem, for teaching us about cultural studies. And also Thanks to Dilip Bard Sir for organizing this session...




            Thanking you....

Thinking Activity : Ecocriticism & Ecofeminism


Thinking Activity : Ecocriticism & Ecofeminism :


  
Hello Readers....

Welcome to my blog,

This is my academic task on Ecocriticism and Ecofeminism. Here is my blog on Ecocriticism and Ecofeminism is in our syllabus. This blog is given by our Professor Dilip Barad Sir. Click here Visit for more information.




About Ecocriticism :

The Founder of the Ecofeminism was Theologian Rosemary Rowther. If they wanted to work towards their liberation, all women insisted that they should accept and act to end the supremacy of nature.

Simply put, ecocriticism is the study of the relationship between literature and the physical environment. Ecocritism takes place, subject to the interrelationship between nature and cultural.


What do you understand by the theory of eco criticism ??




Ecocriticism is a term used to monitor and study the relationship between literature and the earth's environment. It is also mentioned by some other fields such as ecology, biopolitics, sustainable design, environmental histories, environmentalism and others. The first definition by Cheryl Glotfelty of eco criticism.

"Ecocriticism is a study of literature and the environment from an interdisciplinary point of view, where literary scholars analyze texts depicting environmental concerns and examine different ways in which the subject of literature is nature."


About Eco feminism :


This approach combines ecology and feminism and explains the feminist nature to help us understand ecology. Feminists have conceptualized gender theory to analyze the relationship between human and nature. Therefore, it can be considered a branch of ecocriticism and it is an area to study the interconnection between women and nature oppression. Ecofeminism is a branch of feminism that views environmentalism and the relationship between women and the earth, as the foundation for its analysis and practice. Ecophenistic thinkers draw on the concept of gender in order to analyze the relationship between the human and the natural world. "




"The Ecofeminist doctrine asserts that in a feminist perspective of ecology, women are not placed in a dominant position of power, but are called upon to be an egalitarian, collaborative society with no dominant group. Ecofeminism asserts that both women and nature should be respected." This land is often regarded as a woman of nature because of its fertility, which nourishes life and is owned by man as a property. Therefore, feminists draw lines of comparison to understand the equality of male dominant nature over women and the dominance of land in terms of relations.



     Thanking you.....

Thursday, 30 January 2020

Talk on Alfred Tennyson and Robert Browning



Alfred  Tennyson and Robert Browning :

Hello reader.....

Here I put my blog on Talk on Alfred Tennyson and Robert Browning. The blog task is given by vaidehi Haryani Click here to read our ma'am blog....

Alfred Tennyson and Robert Browning are both prominent and prominent figures of the Victorian era and are known as representative poets of the era. The period from 1832 to 1901 is known as the era of the Victorian period. Alfred Tennyson and Robert Browning belong to the Victorian era and have a prominent position as a pre-eminent poet of their age. Both poets use new techniques and styles in poetry writing. But both of these poets adopt their own style in their writings.

So, let's talk about in details....

Alfred Tennyson (6August 1809-6 October 1892) :






Alfred, Lord Tennyson, the perfect Alfred Tennyson, the first Baron Tennyson of Aldworth and Freshwater, an English poet often regarded as the principal representative of the Victorian era in poetry. He was born in 1884 in Pierre. Tennyson was the fourth of 12 children, born into an old Lincolnshire family. More than any other author of the Victorian era, Tennyson was the embodiment of his age, revealing both to his contemporary and modern readers. On his own day, he was accompanied by the so-called Queen Victoria and Prime Minister William Gladstone - one of the three most famous living persuaders whose fame was written by no other poet in English. Alfred Tennyson was the poet laureate of Great Britain and most famous during Queen Victoria's reign and as a British poet. For over half a century Tennyson was not only a man and a poet, he was a voice, the voice of the whole people reflecting their doubts and their faith, their grief and their victory.



Robert Browning (7May 1812-12Dec 1889) :




Robert Browning was an English poet and playwright. His mastery of the famous monologue made him a Victorian poet. His poems are known for their satire, characterization, dark humor, social commentary, historical historical settings and challenging vocabulary and syntax. He is considered an age-wise and philosophical poet. One of Browning's most critically respected poems comes from the monumental Child's Fold to the Dark Tower. Also the early part of Robert Browning's creative life was spent in comparative obscurity, he is regarded as the most important English poet of the Victorian period. His dramatic monologues and psychological epic epic, The Ring and the Book, a novel in verse have established him as a children's author, as he is included in a poem, "The Piper of Hamlin", almost as one in Bells and Pomegranate.


Comparative study between Alfred Tennyson and Robert Browning :

Browning focuses on the mentality of his outrageous characters and seeks to examine the inwardness of such characters in his writings. Browning tries to understand human nature, religion and society properly. It is the internal psychology of the characters.


Tennyson draws material from external specific realities, ideas, and objects. Browning systematically depicts the essence of a character while Tennyson emphasizes the importance of motivating and affirming a certain mood.


One Another significant difference between the poems of Alfred Tennyson and Robert Browning is in the nature of their expression. Browning writing is always upbeat, but Tennyson's expression tone is usually melancholic where it gives a touch of nostalgia. His poetic concerns are rarely related. Tennyson remembers the conscious mind's atmosphere through ornate language.


 Tennyson uses many topics, from the local conditions to the atmospheric observations, as the source of his poetry. Whereas, Browning takes on unethical character and challenges us to seek moral excellence.Tennyson and Browning are important Victorian poets, they differ in background and style. Browning is considered to be the most innovative of the two poets because of its unusual syntax, but indeed under its genre of melphorous and fluid surface, Tennyson is perhaps even more radical innovative.


Thanking you.....